CARLOS SKLIAR LA EDUCACION QUE ES DEL OTRO PDF
La Educación (Que Es) Del Otro by Carlos Skliar at – ISBN – ISBN – Novedades Educativas – Report. El cuidado del otro de Carlos Skliar. PC. Paola Clavijo. Updated 18 April Transcript. EL CUIDADO. DEL OTRO. GRACIAS. Choose a template. “La educación es el lugar de la relación, del encuentro con el otro. Es esto lo que es en primer lugar y por encima de cualquier otra cosa. Es esto lo que la hace.
|Published (Last):||17 November 2013|
|PDF File Size:||11.11 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.9 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
We cannot be together without developing mutual affection. This is apparent even when we laa the disciplinary transformation and the discursive transvestism that is denoted by the passage from special education to “attention s,liar diversity”.
Therefore, it is not simply a question of evaluating dsl situation of disabled persons, but rather to consider how, indeed, the extent of the problem is itself threatened by the extent of the lack of information. However, there always appears a subtle drifting of the difference towards the different, as if we were not capable of talking about the difference itself, and we needed abnormal subjects, who must be corrected. Here I would like to introduce three brief depictions of the idea of inclusion as an aperture and as an opening.
I believe that these are three facets that although one of them looks more institutional, the other two are decidedly ethical. The enormous effort that still has to be done becomes necessary in order to understand that education belongs to the child, it is not directed towards the child, it belongs to him, it is his property.
Perhaps we should xarlos as valid the following ethical-discursive position: Evidently, this is a myriad of questions, a myriad of issues, that perhaps most of our countries are not yet able to answer.
Books by Carlos Skliar
There are four issues I would like now to underline: What I wish to uphold is that the ethical reason should come before the juridical reason, as well as give it support, foundation, vitality, turning it more humane, even though it might sound strange.
These two questions 5 which education cannot fail to ask itself and others, regardless of ecucacion language they speak, what their bodies are like, or what is their way of learning. What do you want from us? We have, unquestionably, qeu a lot in the juridical recognition slkiar in the existence of a juridical system which is adapted, based on solid criteria, just, appropriate for the current world situation, both regional and local, of persons with disabilities.
How many disabled persons are within ,a educational system? I believe, in particular, that relational knowledge comes before disciplinary knowledge, but the reverse is not true: In the scholar tradition there seems to persist a marked attachment to thematic compartmentalization, as when people “talk” about drugs, or about drug-addicts, but nobody speaks with them.
If there is no affection in inclusion we would be creating a far too paradoxical scenario: How not to fall into the temptation of confusing a deaf person with the theme “deafness”, a blind person with the subject “blindness”, a foreigner with the subject foreignness? Whom or what is he referring to?
What can be construed from this affirmation in relation to a supposed “knowing what to do” ed every child, every eel, every language, each learning process, each way of being in the world?
There are on our continent, financing levels that are relatively adequate but are not directly related to the content and aims of juridical skliat on inclusion. This is especially serious in Africa and in Latin Americabut it is also worrying in other continents. Special Relator’s report on the right to education. However, this is not a problem related to the temporal sequence, which must first address the presence at the institutions, and akliar to imagine the nature of this inclusive “interiority” We leave aside some of these considerations to focus in greater detail on some of the possible interpretations of what is happening to inclusion, judging by data generated by the report.
Where are those disabled boys, girls, youngsters, who are not within any known institution? Doubtlessly, looking at the collected data induces at least, several sleepless nights. Skliar, Carlos Should differences be included? This may sound very curious, as it would mean questioning what children have to think of, what they can decide upon by themselves if this attitude is commonplace when “normal” childhood is considered, imagine for a moment what is thought about “abnormal” childhood.
Books by Carlos Skliar (Author of No Tienen Prisa Las Palabras)
Resumen y palabras claves Abstract and keywords Otro resumen. It is here where special education has something to say, something about this minimum knowledge, something about this gestuality without much fuss. There is one detail in particular, that even if it is not surprising, it brings about pain, pain I say, that comes from and represents part of the language of the ethical position that I have assumed, concerning the right to education of disabled persons in Latin America.
It is an ambiguous and contradictory relationship between the juridical reason and the ethical reason. To what extent there has been an increase in drop-out rates because students did not find adequate pedagogical singularities for them in common non-special institutions. How can one interpret this fact?
It “is” not an entity by itself, from itself, by its own definition. On the contrary, we must presuppose the idea of responsibility before the existence of other persons in relation to our own lives.
Even so, they refer to three different instances of inclusion: On the other hand, I think one must be guarded against believing that information is everything, that it can do everything; I mean, it is possible to have updated information but at the same time, one can maintain a relation marked by alienation and disinterest.
La Educacion (Que Es) del Otro
What is going on with his family? Among these questions were the following: Whose problem is inclusion? The knowledge and practices of special education cannot only reside in the professionals. Should differences be included? What can the expressions “to be prepared” and “not to be prepared” mean?
The paradox lies, then, in pretending to discuss the extent of a problem without having data to enable measuring it with precision: And it is not just a matter of proclaiming policies of catlos access to institutions, unrestricted access of all disabled personas to schools, but at the same time, within the same timeframe, creating a thinking pattern and a sensitivity associated to the meaning of being together, the why and wherefore of being rel, the conception of being together.
Is related to equality or to difference? There is a body of knowledge, for example, on childhood, that does not accept that the subject of study can replace by itself the pedagogical relationship with each girl or boy.
Therefore the question of whether to be or not to be trained, or prepared for inclusion is perhaps wrongly formulated. This paper proposes an ethical reinterpretation of the right to education of persons with disabilities, with emphasis being made on the situation in Latin America.
Educacoon Nancy, To be singular pluralMadrid: Perhaps inclusion will allow us to rediscover an educational ethics in both of them. Disability – Inclusion – Difference – Ethical responsibility Resumen: The first one, that in the recent past might have been considered as typical in special education, is related to the teaching of how to live, i.